DENVER B. and MIAMI D. MARINO, individually and on behalf of their son, ELWAY MARINO, Plaintiffs and Appellants
v.
GRASSLAND COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendants and Respondents
v.
RICHARD and LYNNE O'DOUL, JOE and HADASSAH ABRAHAM, individually and on behalf of their sons, PATRICK O'DOUL and SETH ABRAHAM,
Defendants-Intervenors and Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Simmental High School Packers of Simmental, Montana, were the class AB football champions of 1999. When the starting quarterback was sacked and injured his knee in the fourth quarter of the championship game, backup quarterback Elway Marino came off the bench and became the instant town hero when he threw the winning pass. In 2000-2001, his senior year, Elway was the obvious choice for starting quarterback, and the coach made him team captain.
Between the 1999 and 2000 seasons, Elway became involved with the youth group at the Revivalist Evangelical Church. He also went to a summer football camp designed specifically for Christian athletes. There, pregame team prayer was encouraged. "We can't pray over the PA system before the game anymore," said the camp counselors, "but we can still pray in the privacy of the locker room."
Returning to Simmental High School, Elway decided that, as team captain, he had a responsibility to lead his team to Christianity as well as victory. He knew that some team members might not appreciate proselytizing, but he figured that no one would object to a pregame prayer for the safety of the players and offering thanks for the fans.
So Elway began to lead a prayer with teammates in the locker room preceding the team huddle and cheer that the Packers traditionally have engaged in before leaving for the field. There were a few rolled eyeballs and groans at first, but when the team ran up a 3-0 record, many of the other players began to think Elway was onto something. Six team members joined Elway at meetings of the Revivalist Evangelical youth group. By the time their record was 5-0, eleven members of the team attended.
Two players, sophomores Patrick O'Doul and Seth Abraham, did not. They didn't want to be bad sports, they weren't starters, and they sure didn't want to hurt the team's streak, but they had their own deeply and sincerely held religious beliefs. They weren't against prayer in general, but they weren't comfortable with Elway's style. After the third game, they quietly asked the head coach, Titan Denzel, if they had to participate in the pregame prayer session.
Coach Denzel said "you don't have to, of course, but use your own judgment about how it looks to the rest of the team. You know I don't have anything to do with this. It's Marino's thing." They thought about it for a while, and participated in a couple more prayer sessions, but felt very uncomfortable. So, before the sixth game, Patrick and Seth quietly remained by themselves during the prayer and spent some time alone with their own thoughts. The team lost the game.
When other team members blamed Patrick and Seth for snapping the streak, Coach Denzel pointed out that they both warmed the bench for the entire game, so how could they cause the loss? Elway next had a private talk with them, saying that it was OK with him that they had different beliefs, but suggested that maybe they should participate with the rest of the team. "You guys can lead the next prayer," he suggested. "It's probably a good idea so people don't think it's all about me, anyway. You don't even have to mention Jesus if you don't want to. We all worship the same God."
Patrick and Seth talked with their parents, and both families decided to call Coach Denzel and ask him to tell Elway to tone it down. "We don't care if he prays, but when he gets everyone else to pray, he's the team captain. That's state sponsored religion," said the Abrahams. "Our boys don't have a real chance to say no. Look at the harassment they put up with when you lost that game," said the O'Douls.
However, when Coach Denzel asked Elway to stop the pregame group prayer and just quietly say his own prayer, Elway said, "Coach, I gotta 'let my light shine before men,' so that all may see." Remembering the advice of his camp counselors, he added, "you can't prohibit my free exercise of religion. I'm not forcing anyone to pray with me. Everyone wants to, except those two guys."
Coach Denzel talked to the school principal, Ruth Solomon, and the school district's attorney, and together they decided that they were on safer legal ground to tell Elway not to lead a group prayer in the locker room. "Sorry Marino," said the coach, "but some people feel a lot of pressure to do something they aren't comfortable with. We aren't stopping you from worshiping as you please, we just don't want to interfere with anyone else's worship, either."
A week later, after the team lost another game, Mr. and Mrs. Marino, on behalf of Elway, filed a compliant with the Grassland County School Board, charging that Coach Denzel and Principal Solomon interfered with Elway's free exercise of religion. The O'Douls and Abrahams told school board members that they would file a lawsuit if the board kept allowing Elway's prayer sessions. After hearing testimony from everyone involved, the school board dismissed the Marino's complaint and upheld the school administration, saying Elway occupied a position of leadership, so therefore he appeared to be acting on behalf of the public school, and state sponsorship of religion was unconstitutional.
One week after the school board announced their decision, the Marinos filed suit against the school board in the Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court, charging that the board illegally infringed on their son's free exercise of religion under both the Montana and U.S. Constitutions. The Marinos sought an injunction to allow Elway and future students to lead voluntary pregame prayers and sought only nominal damages in the lawsuit. The O'Doul and Abraham families sought and obtained the district court's permission to join as third party intervenors in the case to protect their sons' interests (intervenors have an interest in the outcome of a case, but one which may not be exactly the same as any of the main parties).
While the case was pending, the team went on to a winning season, but lost during the divisional playoffs and didn't go to state. Elway Marino has been offered a full ride scholarship to play college ball for the Bobcats. Patrick O'Doul played in three games during the season and will probably be a starter next year. Seth Abraham quit the team and went out for track.
The district court found for the school board. The Marinos filed this appeal.
Issue One:
If the school district had allowed Marino, as a football team captain who was appointed by the coach, to lead a pregame prayer in the team locker room, would that act be state sponsorship of religion in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article II, Section 5 of the Montana Constitution?
Issue Two:
Did the school district, when they prohibited Marino (acting on his own volition) from leading the pregame prayer, infringe on Marino's freedom of speech and free exercise of religion under the First Amendment and Article II, Sections 5 and 7 of the Montana Constitution?
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS:
U.S. Constitution, Amendment I
Montana Constitution, art. II, §§ 4, 5, 7 and 15
Montana Constitution, art. X, §§ 1, 6 and 7
STATUTES:
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
Mont. Code Ann. § 49-1-102 (1) (2000)
CASES:
Cole v. Oroville Union High School District, 228 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2000) [excerpts]
Chandler v. Siegelman, 230 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2000)
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, ___ U.S. ____, 120 S. Ct. 2266, 147 L. Ed.2d 295 (2000) [excerpts]
Chandler v. James, 180 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 1999) [excerpts]
Kaptein v. Conrad School District, 281 Mont. 152, 931 P.2d 1311 (1997)
Collins v. Chandler Unified School District, 644 F.2d 759 (9th Cir. 1981)
NOTES ON AUTHORITIES
The two issues in this case, establishment of religion and free exercise of religion, are often tackled together in case law. Therefore, all cases may contain material relevant to both issues. When possible, cases have been edited to exclude issues not relevant to this fact pattern.
This is a "case of first impression" for Montana, as there are no Montana cases on prayer in public schools. The Kaptein case is included because it is the major Montana case dealing with religion and public schools, and though it isn't about prayer, it suggests how to interpret the Montana Constitution on these issues. Be sure to read the concurrence and the dissent as well as the main opinion. Kaptein also mentions an earlier case, Bartmess, which laid out the legal principles for a student's right to participate in extracurricular activities.
Santa Fe v. Doe is the most recent and leading U.S. Supreme Court case on prayer in public schools. Both sides should carefully examine how the fact pattern above is similar or different from Santa Fe. Attorneys for the school board will want to use the majority opinion and point out the similarities. Attorneys for the Marinos will want to distinguish the facts of this case from Santa Fe as well as use parts of the dissent.
Chandler v. Siegelman, an Eleventh Circuit case, does a good job of explaining the Santa Fe case. Both sides should read this case, perhaps even before Santa Fe, as it is such a good summary. This case will be particularly helpful for attorneys representing the Marino family. Chandler v. James, also known as "Chandler I," is included for additional background. Chandler I has a good summary of almost all the major U.S. Supreme Court decisions on prayer in public schools and may also be needed to make sense of Chandler v. Siegelman.
Attorneys for the school board will want to use Cole v. Oroville Union High School District, which is the most recent Ninth Circuit decision on prayer in public schools and also examines another way to apply Sante Fe. (Montana is in the Ninth Circuit) Collins v. Chandler Unified School District is an older Ninth Circuit case which deals specifically with student-initiated activity and can be contrasted with Chandler v. Siegelman.
Article II, section 5 of the Montana Constitution is worded almost the same as the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, but it is VERY important to remember that the Montana Supreme Court has specifically and repeatedly said "...we refuse to 'march lock-step' with the United States Supreme Court where constitutional issues are concerned, even if the applicable State Constitution provisions are identical or nearly identical to those of the United States Constitution." State v. Johnson, 221 Mont. 503, 512, 719 P.2d 1248, 1254 (1986). [Youth attorneys may cite this passage along with other research materials if they wish] What this means in practice is that Montana courts cannot take away rights outlined by the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Supreme Court, but it can interpret the Montana Constitution to provide MORE rights than are granted by the U.S. Constitution.
The Montana Constitution has a unique provision, Article X, guaranteeing equal educational opportunity, which does not exist in the U.S. Constitution. This provision may be used by both sides to distinguish the various non-Montana cases.